Thursday, January 30, 2020
Change and the Management of Change Essay Example for Free
Change and the Management of Change Essay Change Management Planning, Implementing, controlling, and reviewing the movement of an organization from its current state to a new one Causes of Change External Incremental (Evolutionary) â⬠¢Occurs slowly over time (fuel-efficient cars) Dramatic (Revolutionary) â⬠¢Can cause many problems especially if unexpected â⬠¢Might lead to total rethink of operation of organization oBusiness Process Re-Engineering Business Process Re-EngineeringFundamentally rethinking and redesigning the processes of a business to achieve a dramatic improvement in performance Globalization-Increasing interdependence for countriesââ¬â¢ economies through free trade and multinational company investment â⬠¢New opportunities to sell products in other countries â⬠¢Increased competition from products made more cheaply in other countries-often by multinationals â⬠¢Use either pan-global marketing for localization strategies â⬠¢Achieve and try to maintain a competitive advantage Technological Advances-Leading to new products and new processes â⬠¢Products: new computer games, iPods and iPhones, hybrid-powered cars. â⬠¢Processes: robots in production; computer assisted design (CAD) in design offices and computer systems for stock control. â⬠¢Staff retraining â⬠¢Purchase of new equipment â⬠¢Additions to product portfolio-Other products may be dropped â⬠¢Need for quicker product development which may require new organizational structures and teams Macro-Economic Change- Fiscal Policy, Interest Rates, Business Cycleâ⬠¢Changes in consumersââ¬â¢ disposable incomes-and demand patterns that result from this â⬠¢Boom or recession conditions-need for extra capacity or rationalism â⬠¢Need for flexible production systems (staff flexibility) to cope with demand changes â⬠¢Explain need for extra capacity or need to rationalize â⬠¢Deal with staff cutbacks in way that encourages staff who remain to accept change Legal Changes â⬠¢Changes to what can be sold â⬠¢Working hours and conditions â⬠¢Staff training on company policy â⬠¢Flexible working hours and practices Competitorsââ¬â¢ Actions â⬠¢New products â⬠¢Lower prices â⬠¢Higher promotional budgetsâ⬠¢Encourage new ideas from staff â⬠¢Increase efficiency by staff accepting need to change production methods â⬠¢Ensure resources available to meet challenge Environmental Factors â⬠¢Increase green consumerism â⬠¢Increasing concern about industryââ¬â¢s contribution to climate change â⬠¢Social and environmental audits supported by strategic changes (recycle packaging) Internal Organizational Changes â⬠¢Delayering* â⬠¢Matrix structure** replaces hierarchicalà º â⬠¢Retraining of less senior staff to accept more responsibility â⬠¢Job security â⬠¢Retraining staff in teamwork and project management Relocation â⬠¢Moving operations to another region/country â⬠¢Redundancy schemes for workers who lose their jobs â⬠¢Grants for those willing to move Cutting Costs To Improve Competitiveness â⬠¢Capital-intensive rather that labour-intensive methods â⬠¢Rationalisation of operations â⬠¢Retraining staff to operate advanced tech. â⬠¢Redundancy schemes for workers who lose their jobs â⬠¢Flexible employment contracts and working practices *DelayeringRemoval of one or more of the levels of hierarchy from an organizational structure **Matrix StructureAn organizational structure that creates project teams that cut across traditional functional departments à ° Level of Hierarchy A stage of the organisational structure atà which the personnel on it have equal status and authority Factors Causing Resistance to Change â⬠¢Fear of Unknown (Uncertainty) â⬠¢Fear of Failure (Skills/Abilities beyond workerââ¬â¢s capabilities) â⬠¢Losing Something of Value (Income, Status, Job Security) â⬠¢False Beliefs (Some convince themselves current system will work to avoid risks) â⬠¢Lack of Trust (Past experiences between workers and managers) â⬠¢Inertia (Might have to work harder) Strategies to Reduce Impact of/Resistance to Change Change Management Force-Field AnalysisAn analytical process used to map the opposing forces within an environment (such as a business) where change is taking place 1.Outline proposal for change 2.List forces for and against change 3.Assign estimated score for each force â⬠¢Weighs importance of forces â⬠¢Helps identify who is most likely impacted by change â⬠¢How to strengthen forces supporting decision and reduce forces against it â⬠¢Can implement leadership style that reduces opposition and resistance to change Project ChampionA person assigned to support and drive a project forward. Their role is to explain the benefits of change and assist and support the team putting change into practice Project GroupsCreated by an organisation to address a problem that requires input from different specialists Promote Change 1.Establish a sense of urgency. 2.Create an effective project team to lead the change. 3.Develop a vision and a strategy for change. 4.Communicate this change vision. 5.Empower people to take action. 6.Generate short-term gains from change that benefit as many people as possible. 7.Consolidate these gains and produce even more change. 8.Build change into the culture of the organisation so that it becomes a natural process.
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
An Inspector Calls by J.B.Priestly Who killed Eva Smith? Essay
An Inspector Calls by J.B.Priestly Who killed Eva Smith? There are many different factors involved with the death of Eva Smith that should be considered while asking the question whom ultimately killed Eva Smith. Each one of the Birling family (including Gerald Croft) pushed Eva Smith that extra bit closer to killing herself, but no one person was individually responsible for her death. Whether one person was more to blame than any other it is hard to say. Although these people contributed to her unfortunate end to life, her position in life and society are also greatly to blame. It is Mr. Arthur Birling who starts off the train of events, as he is the first to come in to contact with Eva Smith. Mr. Birling sacked Eva Smith from his factory after she and a few others went on strike, demanding higher wages. As Mr. Birling said to the inspector, 'She'd had a lot to say - far too much - so she had to go'. I don't see that he did anything wrong, anyone in his position would have done the same. And as he says, it's his duty 'to keep labour costs down'. He's a 'hardheaded businessman', as he calls himself, he'd do anything to make as much profit as possible. He wasn't to know what would happen to Eva Smith two years down the line, after he sacked her. As he said 'If you don't come down sharply on some of theses people, they'd soon be asking for the earth'. Although Mr. Birling didn't do anything wrong in my eyes, he wasn't portrayed too well throughout the play. He shows himself to be arrogant, complacent and self-absorbed. One major flaw in Mr. Birling's behaviour is that he seems to show no remorse at all for Eva, and after all he did help drive her to commit suicide. He shows no regret for dismissing E... ...ike ending her life, and she wouldn't be lying on a slab with her insides burnt out. After all, she was the person who decided to kill herself, she could have tried for another job, she could have accepted the money from Eric and she could have made him responsible for the baby, when it came. In conclusion, it would be unfair to put the blame onto one person, when each and every one of them helped contribute to Evas' miserable end to life. It may be more accurate to blame society, her class, and the time in which she lived. No real crime has been committed in this play, but I believe that the Birling family should share the moral responsibility for this young woman's pitiful suicide. Then maybe next time they are about to do something selfish they'll think of the devestation they might bring to others, and not just the benefit they bring to themselves.
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
Different styles of leadership Essay
Marianne and Betsy do have different styles of leadership. Betsy is the more authority compliance manager and as well a little middle of the road off management. Marianne is more of country club management and as well as middle of the road. From experience with those management style. I think Betsy should focus more on what her direct manager wants. If your relatively new to a company, it would be very bad to rock the boat. I donââ¬â¢t think she should continue to follow the same leadership style because quite frankly itââ¬â¢s not working. However she should totally abandon her authority leadership style. Honestly Marianne and Betsy are at a point where they desperate need to work together to get the main goal in the right perspective. Marianne should become move of an authority compliant manager by giving her friendship with Bridget and Suzanne just a little separation. Betsy also needs to learn how to be more of a middle of the road team player management. She canââ¬â¢t rely on being too bossy, especially when her own boss tells her she is bossy thatââ¬â¢s a very bad sign. Betsy and Marianne can work together if they both come to an understanding. Betsy is more in a jam then Marianne. Betsy works under Marianne and Betsy is a fairly new employee. If Betsy resist Marianne and goes to senior management it could possible jeopardize her employment. Furthermore Marianne has the majority vote amongst the staff. Betsy might have to loosen up her rings and join more of the middle of the road management or either takes some tips into the country club management.
Sunday, January 5, 2020
The Organizational System Of Yanomami - 994 Words
The Organizational System of Yanomami The world aggregates a lot of small societies, and groups, and each group has its own culture and economic system. Yanomami is located in the Amazon forest, in the south of Venezuela and northern Brazil and is one of the largest tribes in the Amazon. This group has an appealing history, because of the aggressive way they responded to anthropologists who tried to investigate more about them. Due to their reactions against anthropologist, it is a challenge to do a research in their lifestyle. Their method of subsistence is considered old-fashioned. The economic system is based in foraging and trades, and recently they started using the horticulture. ââ¬Å"Horticulture can be defined as farming without the use of technologies like the plow, irrigation, fertilizer or draft animals.â⬠(Eller, 134) Talk about their economic system is interesting because, as an indigenous group their resources are limited and they have not good relationship with t he western civilization. Historically, they have been facing ecological problems. In 1975, a mineralogical survey revealed the presence of gold in Yanomamiââ¬â¢s land, since then they have been fighting against miners, because they brought diseases and killed many Yanomamis. Economy is what ensures the sustainability of a society. It is important that a group has an independent economic system. Yanomami is not completely independent, because they depend on the natural resources Amazon forest provides to them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)