Wednesday, January 22, 2020
An Inspector Calls by J.B.Priestly Who killed Eva Smith? Essay
An Inspector Calls by J.B.Priestly Who killed Eva Smith?    There are many different factors involved with the death of Eva Smith  that should be considered while asking the question whom ultimately  killed Eva Smith. Each one of the Birling family (including Gerald  Croft) pushed Eva Smith that extra bit closer to killing herself, but  no one person was individually responsible for her death. Whether one  person was more to blame than any other it is hard to say. Although  these people contributed to her unfortunate end to life, her position  in life and society are also greatly to blame.    It is Mr. Arthur Birling who starts off the train of events, as he is  the first to come in to contact with Eva Smith. Mr. Birling sacked Eva  Smith from his factory after she and a few others went on strike,  demanding higher wages. As Mr. Birling said to the inspector, 'She'd  had a lot to say - far too much - so she had to go'. I don't see that  he did anything wrong, anyone in his position would have done the  same. And as he says, it's his duty 'to keep labour costs down'. He's  a 'hardheaded businessman', as he calls himself, he'd do anything to  make as much profit as possible. He wasn't to know what would happen  to Eva Smith two years down the line, after he sacked her. As he said  'If you don't come down sharply on some of theses people, they'd soon  be asking for the earth'.    Although Mr. Birling didn't do anything wrong in my eyes, he wasn't  portrayed too well throughout the play. He shows himself to be  arrogant, complacent and self-absorbed. One major flaw in Mr.  Birling's behaviour is that he seems to show no remorse at all for  Eva, and after all he did help drive her to commit suicide. He shows  no regret for dismissing E...              ...ike ending her  life, and she wouldn't be lying on a slab with her insides burnt out.  After all, she was the person who decided to kill herself, she could  have tried for another job, she could have accepted the money from  Eric and she could have made him responsible for the baby, when it  came.    In conclusion, it would be unfair to put the blame onto one person,  when each and every one of them helped contribute to Evas' miserable  end to life. It may be more accurate to blame society, her class, and  the time in which she lived. No real crime has been committed in this  play, but I believe that the Birling family should share the moral  responsibility for this young woman's pitiful suicide. Then maybe next  time they are about to do something selfish they'll think of the  devestation they might bring to others, and not just the benefit they  bring to themselves.                      
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.